inside track

mixed media

crank call

local matters

hackie

work

tubefed

web feat

ask lola

flick chick

astrology

f

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

 

backtalk

HISTORY LITE


BY PETER KURTH (published 04.27.05)

 

 

 

 

“There is something in the wind abroad in this land besides the vapors of spring.” – Jim Kunstler

 

Right you are, Jim, and I’ll tell you what it is.  It’s a citizenry that knows nothing about history. 

 

I’m moved to say this not just from conviction, but because Ding-Dong, George W. Bush, turned up last week at the opening of the new, improved, high-tech, holographic, pornographic, Disney-style “Lincoln Museum” in Springfield, Illinois, dedicated to the memory of Abraham Lincoln.  There, Dubya delivered himself of a few remarks. 

 

“I am so honored to be here,” he said, “to dedicate a great institution honoring such a great American.  Laura and I were just given a tour.”

 

Imagine that!  While you’re at it, imagine Universal Studios’ “Island of Adventure” in Orlando.  Throw in a couple of spooky Lincoln faces, a lot of guns going off at Antietam, John Wilkes Booth jumping down from the assassination scene, and there you have it -- History Lite.  A dumber show couldn’t exist outside Crawford, Texas. 

 

Better people than I last week -- provided they could wade their way through all those stories about the pope and those TV dramas pretending that “American voters never knew” Franklin Roosevelt had had polio (they did, very well) -- tried to balance Bush’s brain with Lincoln’s.  All of them, so far as I know, have since run shrieking into corners, begging for death.  I refer especially to David Rossie’s piece in The Binghamton (NY) Press and Sun-Bulletin, which pled – no, wept – for Americans to wake up and see how far they’ve been duped.  Rossie did nothing but quote the respective commanders-in-chief:

 

Lincoln (1858):  “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master.  This expresses my idea of democracy.  Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is no democracy.”

 

Dubya (2003, speaking from Senegal, on the west coast of Africa):  “I had the opportunity to go out to Goree Island and talk about what slavery meant to America.  It’s very interesting when you think about it.  The slaves who left here to go to America, because of their steadfast and their religion and their belief in freedom, helped change America.”

 

“Their steadfast,” indeed.  How dumb are we?  How dumb do they think we are?

 

Don’t answer that.  “Most of you all know,” Bush continued, that “the First Lady was a librarian.  Any time she can get me into a library is a pretty good deal, as far as she's concerned.” 

 

That Goofus was in a museum, not a library, when he said this, is a distinction I’m willing to overlook (inasmuch as the place is called The Abraham Lincoln Library and Museum).  That he doesn’t know the difference between a museum and a library is something I’m not willing to overlook when he compares himself to Lincoln, and especially when he throws the burden on the “First Lady.” (If she were a real librarian, she'd have seen through this long ago.  She’d have had a divorce.)

 

"In a small way,” Dubya stumbled on (and, for once, this rat-faced bastard got the word right), “I can relate to the rail-splitter from out West because he had a way of speaking that was not always appreciated by the newspapers back East. A New York Times story on his first inaugural address reported that Mr. Lincoln was lucky 'it was not the constitution of the English language and the laws of English grammar that he was called upon to support.' I think that fellow is still writing for the Times."

 

Oh, he’d better be.  Let us pray that he is.

 

“[Lincoln’s] very election as president was regarded as a cause for war … And as he sent legions of men to death and sacrifice, his own burden began to show in a lined and tired face."

 

Leave it to Ding-Dong to render the whole thing as a question of cosmetics.  And leave it to him, also, to know nothing about Lincoln, who declared, as he sent “men to death and sacrifice” during the Civil War, that his head was “low and bent”; that no pride could accrue to it; and that his only goal was to preserve the Union.  Not the “Republicans” or the “Democrats” or the slaves or “democracy” or “freedom” or anything else – but the Union. 

 

I don’t think Dubya even knows what the Union is.  In the same inaugural address of 1861, Lincoln hoped that “the better angels of our nature” would one day prevail.  And, when he said that, he wasn’t talking about “God.”

 

"Mr. Lincoln had no faith and no hope in the usual acceptation of those words,’ said Mary Lincoln after her husband’s death (speaking of “First Ladies”).  “He never joined a church; but still, as I believe, he was a religious man by nature.   He first seemed to think about the subject when our boy Willie died, and then more than ever about the time he went to Gettysburg; but it was a kind of poetry in his nature, and he was never a technical Christian."

 

Uh-oh.  Last week, Bush’s vice president, Dick Cheney, announced that he, in his capacity as president of the Senate, would cast the decisive vote, if necessary, to further the Republican party’s goal of “ending the filibuster” -- the so-called nuclear option (which Republicans are now calling “the constitutional option,” since “nuclear” didn’t play well in polls).  All this, supposedly, in the interest of appointing “Christian” judges to the federal bench – “people of faith.”

 

Any student of history knows that this effort is not about “faith.” It’s not about Christianity, either.  It’s a blatant and garish attempt to destroy the constitutional separation of powers, and to put that power, ultimately, solely in the hands of the executive, the “president.”  Who, at the moment, is a figurehead – no Lincoln, you might say. 

 

In 1862, Mary Lincoln heard that one of her brothers, fighting on the Confederate side, had been killed in battle.  Elizabeth Keckley, her best friend and a black woman, wondered why she wasn’t devastated by it. 

 

“Of course,” Mary said, “it is but natural that I should feel for one so nearly related to me, but not to the extent that you suppose.   He made his choice long ago. ..  He has been fighting against us; and since he chose to be our deadly enemy, I see no special reason why I should bitterly mourn his death.'" 

 

Laura – read a few more books and get back to me.  I wish I could be hopeful, but I’m not. 

 

 

www.peterkurth.com


Tell us what you think...

© Seven Days Newspaper, 2002 | www.sevendaysvt.com
for web queries: graphics@sevendaysvt.com